Passage
Read the full passage. Bracketed letters like [A] mark the four positions for the insert-text question.
The Wind That Wasn't the Problem
¶1 A suspension bridge is only as strong as its ability to move without breaking. In July 1940, engineers in Washington State opened one across the Puget Sound, linking Tacoma to the far shore. From its first days, drivers noticed something strange: in even a moderate wind, the roadway rolled up and down in long, smooth waves instead of simply swaying side to side. The motion earned the bridge its nickname, Galloping Gertie, and engineers who studied it judged it uncomfortable but not dangerous. Four months later, a wind of only about forty miles an hour, far weaker than what the bridge had been designed to withstand, tore the roadway apart and sent it into the water below.
¶2 The wind that afternoon did not blow in one steady sheet. [A] As it crossed the roadway, it separated into swirling pockets of air that pushed against the bridge first from above and then from below. [B] Every object has a natural rhythm at which it moves most easily, the way a playground swing rises highest when each push lands at exactly the right moment. [C] The wind's pushes that day happened to arrive in almost exactly that rhythm. This matching effect is called resonance: each new push lands at the peak of the last swing and adds to it. [D] Because of this pattern, the twisting did not settle down; each cycle added a little more, until the steel could no longer bend without breaking.
¶3 By mid-morning on November 7, the roadway was twisting so far that one edge of the deck rose several meters above the other before snapping back the opposite way. Drivers abandoned their cars in the middle of the span and crawled to safety along the swaying sidewalk. An engineering professor happened to be filming the bridge's motion that morning and captured its final collapse on camera. Just before eleven o'clock, a section of roadway broke free and fell into the water below, and slabs of concrete followed. No one on the bridge was killed, though a dog left behind in a car went down with the wreckage.
¶4 To the public, the collapse looked like proof that the wind that day had simply been too strong for the bridge to survive. Engineers who studied film of the disaster found the opposite. The wind on November 7 was only moderate, well within the range the bridge had been designed to handle if it blew steadily. What destroyed the bridge was not the wind's strength but its rhythm, and the solid, plate-like sides that gave the roadway its modern look were exactly what let the wind's pockets form in a steady beat. Engineers who rebuilt the crossing years later used open steel trusses instead of solid sides, letting wind pass through rather than push against a flat wall. Wind-tunnel testing of bridge models also became standard practice worldwide.
- truss: a framework of steel beams with open spaces, used here so wind can pass through instead of pushing against a solid wall
Questions
11 questions — every TOEFL Reading question type, in test order.
Answer
Answer
Answer
Answer
Answer
Highlighted: "What destroyed the bridge was not the wind's strength but its rhythm, and the solid, plate-like sides that gave the roadway its modern look were exactly what let the wind's pockets form in a steady beat."
Answer
Answer
Answer
Answer
This matching does not require a strong wind, only a persistent one.
Where would the sentence best fit?
Answer
In 1940, a new suspension bridge in Washington State collapsed just months after opening, and the cause turned out to be not the strength of the wind but the rhythm of its pushes matching the bridge's own natural motion.