Write about the topic below for 5 minutes
Some people think cities should use more cameras and sensors to manage traffic and safety. Others think this kind of technology invades people's privacy. Which do you agree with?
A follow-up question based on your answer will appear here.
Useful Expressions
Show Model Answer · Step 1
I agree that cities should use more cameras and sensors, as long as clear rules control how the data is used. Smart traffic systems can reduce accidents and shorten commutes by adjusting signals in real time.
Sensors can also help emergency services respond faster by detecting accidents or fires before anyone even calls for help. These benefits directly improve people's daily safety and quality of life.
The key is transparency. Cities should explain what data they collect, how long they keep it, and who can access it. With those protections in place, the benefits of smart city technology outweigh the privacy concerns.
Show Model Answer · Step 2
I agree that safety matters a great deal in public spaces, but treating it as more important than privacy in every case is too simple. Privacy protections and safety measures can work together instead of competing.
For example, a city can use sensors to detect traffic problems without storing footage of individual people's faces or license plates longer than necessary. This still improves safety while limiting how much personal data is collected.
Once a city builds a large surveillance system, that data can be misused later, even if the original goal was safety. Strong rules around data protect both safety and privacy at the same time.