How to practice: This set collects only the Writing Sample question type from the real DET (Duolingo English Test) — DET Writing questions. No grading, no timer — solve it yourself, then tap each question to reveal the answer or model response.
Q1
To what extent should governments regulate social media content? Use specific arguments and examples to support your position.
Useful Expressions
I believe that · the case for · however, critics argue · any regulatory framework must
Show Model Answer
The question of government regulation of social media content sits at the intersection of two values that are difficult to reconcile: the imperative to prevent demonstrable harm and the equally important principle of protecting free expression. I believe a calibrated, evidence-based approach to regulation is both justified and necessary, but that the scope of such regulation must be carefully defined to avoid the risks that come with granting governments broad authority over speech.
The case for some degree of regulation is strong. Unmoderated social media platforms have demonstrably contributed to the spread of health misinformation, the incitement of political violence, and the systematic harassment of vulnerable groups. The European Union's Digital Services Act provides a useful model: it focuses on platform transparency, algorithmic accountability, and the removal of clearly illegal content, rather than empowering governments to make direct judgments about the acceptability of political speech.
However, critics of content regulation raise a legitimate concern. History suggests that regulatory authority over media is frequently captured by those in power and used to suppress legitimate dissent. Any regulatory framework must therefore include robust safeguards: independent oversight bodies, transparent appeals processes, and clear prohibitions on government interference with political speech. The goal should be to hold platforms accountable for the systemic harms their design choices produce, not to make governments arbiters of acceptable opinion.
The case for some degree of regulation is strong. Unmoderated social media platforms have demonstrably contributed to the spread of health misinformation, the incitement of political violence, and the systematic harassment of vulnerable groups. The European Union's Digital Services Act provides a useful model: it focuses on platform transparency, algorithmic accountability, and the removal of clearly illegal content, rather than empowering governments to make direct judgments about the acceptability of political speech.
However, critics of content regulation raise a legitimate concern. History suggests that regulatory authority over media is frequently captured by those in power and used to suppress legitimate dissent. Any regulatory framework must therefore include robust safeguards: independent oversight bodies, transparent appeals processes, and clear prohibitions on government interference with political speech. The goal should be to hold platforms accountable for the systemic harms their design choices produce, not to make governments arbiters of acceptable opinion.
More writing sample sets at other levels · Browse the full DET question bank